Warning: The magic method OCDI\OneClickDemoImport::__wakeup() must have public visibility in /home/soccerre/public_html/wp-content/plugins/one-click-demo-import/inc/OneClickDemoImport.php on line 128
Disgrace’ – Sky Sports pundit rages live on air at what happened in West Ham v Newcastle – SoccerReporters
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Westham Fc

Disgrace’ – Sky Sports pundit rages live on air at what happened in West Ham v Newcastle

Sky Sports pundit goes berserk at West Ham United v Newcastle United ‘disgrace’ after controversial incident

Darren Ambrose was left in tears after criticising Peter Bankes’ refereeing during West Ham’s 2-2 draw with Newcastle United on Sunday at the London Stadium.

There were a number of questionable incidents in the first half, including a second yellow card for West Ham striker Bruno Gueiro and the referee’s decision-making on who should be booked for dissent.

Ambrose, a Sky Sports pundit, did not want to talk about the referee during the game, but he was left in tears because of Bankes’ inconsistency.

West Ham

Ambrose stated the following on Sunday, October 8 at 2:36 p.m. on Sky Sports News: “The inconsistent officiating in this game alone has been a disgrace.

“Look, it’s Peter Bankes; you don’t want to sit here whining about referees all the time.

What happened was that Lascelles had a great forward run, and Lucas Paqueta committed a cynical foul that was quite similar to Guimaraes’ and should have resulted in a booking but didn’t. Almiron is motioning once more for a yellow card, even though he already handed Emerson one. Guimaraes should have been handed a red card, but he simply gave Michail Antonio a yellow card and a foul following an incredible display of talent from Isak.

“It’s the inconsistency we’re always complaining about and it’s coming to fruition once again in this game.

“There’ll be more goals and more yellow cards, if not red cards, in this game because the referee is losing control.”

West Ham

Referees not helping themselves

Over the past week, the standard of English football refereeing has been the subject of back pages. The Liverpool v Tottenham VAR controversy highlighted major shortcomings in the way the game is played at the Stockley Park, but in the final analysis, it is impossible to make the game work when the refereeing is inconsistent with their own judgement.

Michael Oliver can be forgiven for saying a foul is a foul. Paul Tierney can also be forgiven for saying it is a foul, as these things are to a certain extent subjective.

Why would Bankes book Emerson for asking him to call on a player and not do so for Almiron?

It is no surprise that fans are coming out in droves to suggest that there is a sinister motive behind the refereeing decisions, as it is so inconceivable that they would do some of these things.

The English Premier League is supposed to be one of the best leagues in the world, and yet it is being managed by a pack of incompetent clowns.

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tottenham Hotspur

“significant one” – Update from the gaffer on the injuries to James Maddison and Micky van de Ven Vicario gave an incredible performance against...

Leeds United

‘Going to happen’: Phil Hay says Leeds teenager is leaving for £5m, Jurgen Klopp and Spurs miss out Despite a recent dearth of information,...

Westham Fc

Declan Rice tries to defuse tensions with West Ham fans Declan Rice was sold by West Ham to Arsenal during the summer transfer window...

Tottenham Hotspur

Tottenham ‘make final decision’ on splashing out £115m on Harry Kane replacement Tottenham face a bill of over £115m for Harry Kane’s potential replacement....